Civil Liberty and the State: The Writ of Habeas Corpus, by
Richard M. Ebeling,
Freedom Daily, Apr 2002
Highlights of English and American history on the writ of habeas corpus, in particular the 17th century conflict between Charles I and Edward Coke
When [King] Charles sent a message that he would respect the principles of the Magna Carta in general, Coke replied,
Did ever Parliament rely on messages? ... The King's answer is very gracious; but what is the law of the realm? That is the question. ... Let us put up a Petition of Right; not that I distrust the King, but that I cannot take his trust but in a Parliamentary way.
... Finally, the king gave in to a joint statement prepared by the Houses of Commons and Lords insisting that he accede to the two resolutions, and the Petition of Right was passed and read into the Statute Book.
An Independent Judiciary, by
Jim Powell,
The Triumph of Liberty, 4 Jul 2000
Lengthy biographical essay on Edward Coke; first chapter of section 9, "Protecting Liberty"
[Charles I] continued to make demands, and on May 8 Coke proposed that Parliament adopt a petition of right on "1. The personal liberty of the subject. 2. His propriety in his goods. 3. Unbilletting of soldiers. And 4. Silencing of martial law in time of peace." Charles insisted on his prerogatives, but Coke remained defiant. On June 8, Charles ... capitulated and accepted the petition of right as law ... Charles disregarded the Petition of Right and refused to call another Parliament for eleven years. But Coke's principles inspired John Lilburne and other English freedom fighters.