Knight, Frank H. (1885-1972)
, by Richard Boyd, The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism
, 15 Aug 2008
"Frank Hyneman Knight was born in McLean County, Illinois, and was educated at small denominational colleges in Tennessee. ... Knight's interest in developing an American institutionalist economics was the primary motive behind his appointment as professor of economics at the University of Chicago in 1927, where he taught until his retirement in 1952. Along with his colleague, Jacob Viner, Knight is regarded as one of the formative influences on the Chicago School of Economics. Among Knight's students during his early years at Chicago were Milton Friedman, George Stigler, Henry Simons, Aaron Director, and, later, James Buchanan."
7 Nov 1885
, Frank Hyneman Knight, in White Oak, McLean County, Illinois
Best of Both Worlds: Milton Friedman reminisces about his career as an economist and his lifetime "avocation" as a spokesman for freedom
, by Milton Friedman
, Brian Doherty, Reason
, Jun 1995
Topics discussed include: the new Congress, flat taxes, the withholding tax, the people who influenced him, what led him to write about policy issues, libertarianism and how his political views have changed over the years
"I was exposed as an undergraduate at Rutgers to two very strong influences: Homer Jones, who was a student of Frank Knight's from Chicago, and Arthur Burns. ... Thanks to Homer, I was offered a scholarship at the University of Chicago and I went to Chicago and studied with Frank Knight, Jacob Viner, Henry Schultz, and so on. ... I got a very good grounding in economic theory and statistics as well."
Related Topics: American Enterprise Institute
, Compulsory Education
, Friedrich Hayek
, Ludwig von Mises
, Mont Pelerin Society
, Richard Nixon
, Ayn Rand
, Ronald Reagan
, Murray Rothbard
Book Review: Perfect Competition and the Transformation of Economics by Frank M. Machovec
[PDF], by John B. Egger, Cato Journal
Review of the subject book, which argues that economics "embracing of perfect competition", over rivalrous competition, was a scientific revolution (as per Thomas Kuhn), but that led the profession down the wrong path
"A Kuhnian story is more powerful if one can identify a unique revolutionary spark. For Machovec it was one book: Frank Knight's Risk, Uncertainty and Profit ( 1971). He sees Knight as 'the leading expositor of the perfectly competitive model' (p. 265). But Knight’s role as 'leading expositor' has been controversial, most recently on the Austrian economics Internet discussion group, and I shall not try to resolve it here. Knight, the classic 'puzzler' (Hayek 1978), is often delightful (Knight 1956) but was on the wrong end of the capital controversy with Hayek."
James M. Buchanan and the Rebirth of Political Economy
, by Peter Boettke
, Economics and its Discontents
Examines Buchanan's contributions in bursting the "romantic vision of political science," advancing subjectivism as a challenge to modern economics formalism and re-integrating moral philosophy into economics
"A self-described libertarian socialist ... Buchanan was 'converted' ... after six-weeks of price theory with Frank Knight. The libertarian values remained, but now Buchanan understood through Knight that the market (not government) was the organizational form most consistent with those values. Knight became for Buchanan his intellectual role model—challenge everything and anyone, nothing should be treated as sacred, and recognize that most ideas peddled about are nonsense. ... From Knight, Buchanan got his basic economic theory framework and the idea that economics is not a science in the traditional meaning of that term."
The life and times of F.A. Hayek, who explained why political liberty is impossible without economic liberty
, by Jim Powell
Lengthy biographical essay, with extensive quotes both from Hayek and others (including Keynes)
"Then Machlup showed the page proofs [of The Road to Serfdom] to Aaron Director, Milton Friedman's brother-in-law. Presumably it was Director who sent the page proofs to Frank Knight, the most influential thinker in the University of Chicago's economics department. Knight, in turn, seems to have urged the book on William Couch, editor of the University of Chicago Press, and the decision was made to publish it."